Position of Policy Regulations (Beleidsregel) in the Indonesian Positive Law System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19637303Keywords:
Position, Testing, Policy Regulations, IndonesiaAbstract
The absence of regulations governing policy regulations has resulted in differences of opinion regarding the review of policy regulations, this is due to the unclear position of policy regulations in the Indonesian positive legal system. The aim of this research is to determine the position of policy regulations and the authority to review policy regulations in the Indonesian positive law system. This research uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach and a case approach using literature study and document study. The results obtained in this research are that policy regulations are not included in statutory regulations, the existence of policy regulations is based on free discretion carried out to complement deficiencies or weaknesses in the principle of legality which is always based on written statutory regulations. Testing of policy regulations can be done through executive review namely by submitting an objection to the official who issued the policy regulation and appealing to the superior of the official who issued the policy regulation as an initial effort and judicial review to the Supreme Court with basic principles the court knows and jurisprudence if efforts executive review did not succeed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vera Novianti, Muhamad Aksan Akbar, Syamsul Rijal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Sangia Nibandera Law Research are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). By submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors agree to the terms outlined below regarding the distribution, use, and sharing of their work. All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



